FOREWORD

Fossil fuel companies are fuelling climate breakdown, buying public trust  through advertising and sponsorship. Just as we banned tobacco advertising  to protect public health, it's time to apply the same logic to fossil fuels.  


Advertising works. It’s why these firms spend billions placing their logos in  sports, culture, and public spaces. These deals give polluters a social licence,  masking their role in a worsening global crisis and reaching audiences who may  otherwise not engage with climate issues.  

Meanwhile, up to 30,000 people die prematurely each year in the UK due to air  pollution, much of it from fossil fuels. Children are growing up with asthma and  lung disease while their future is being sold to the highest bidder.  


Other countries are acting. France, the Netherlands and Spain have begun  restricting fossil fuel promotion. The UK must follow suit.  


This briefing sets out how and why we should ban fossil fuel advertising and  sponsorship. It’s a practical, proven step to protect public health and tackle the  climate crisis.  

Let’s get the ban done. 

Fossil fuel companies are fuelling climate breakdown, buying public trust  through advertising and sponsorship. Just as we banned tobacco advertising  to protect public health, it's time to apply the same logic to fossil fuels.  


Advertising works. It’s why these firms spend billions placing their logos in  sports, culture, and public spaces. These deals give polluters a social licence,  masking their role in a worsening global crisis and reaching audiences who may  otherwise not engage with climate issues.  

Meanwhile, up to 30,000 people die prematurely each year in the UK due to air  pollution, much of it from fossil fuels. Children are growing up with asthma and  lung disease while their future is being sold to the highest bidder.  


Other countries are acting. France, the Netherlands and Spain have begun  restricting fossil fuel promotion. The UK must follow suit.  


This briefing sets out how and why we should ban fossil fuel advertising and  sponsorship. It’s a practical, proven step to protect public health and tackle the  climate crisis.  

Let’s get the ban done. 

CHRIS PACKHAM CBE 

Broadcaster & environmental campaigner 

OUR PARTNERS

INTRODUCTION

Oil and gas giants like BP and Shell spend millions saturating UK media with  misleading adverts. They falsely claim to be leading the energy transition, while  continuing to expand fossil fuel production and locking us into climate disaster. Less  than 1% (1) of their profits are invested in renewable energy and many are quietly scaling back their net-zero (2) commitments. Currently, only 7 out of 87 (3) energy companies operating in the North Sea have any plans for renewables investment to  2030 . Their ongoing extractive operations only deepen the climate crisis rather than offering solutions to it.

THE ADVERTISING STANDARDS AUTHORITY IS OUTGUNNED

Image credit: Shell/YouTube

Advertising for oil and gas products is increasingly deceptive, (4) with marketing teams being highly skilled at navigating the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA)’s CAP 5 codes — guidelines intended to shield the public from misinformation. Adverts for oil and gas consistently and routinely deploy sophisticated language and imagery, designed to mislead the public, while staying just within the boundaries of the ASA codes. For example, a Shell advert in 2024 depicted wind farms along with the text “Shell is helping power the UK now and into the future” giving the impression  that that future would be powered by wind.  

The ASA received over seventy complaints from the public, yet due to the additional  imagery of an oil and gas platform in the advert, Shell were able to avoid a ruling to  remove it.  

If the ASA does impose a ban, the ruling almost always arrives six months after a  campaign has been running or even after it has ended, rendering the restriction  totally ineffective. For example, in 2025, the ASA imposed a ban (6) on a Total Energies advert, stating that it “created the impression that TotalEnergies’ business activities  were predominately focused on the development of renewable energies…

1 https://www.iea.org/reports/the-oil-and-gas-industry-in-net-zero-transitions/executive-summary 
2 https://tinyurl.com/3n8wvw6x 
3 http://bit.ly/3HXMNql 
4 https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.kluwer/jeucml0010&div=8&id=&page= The ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) CAP Codes set the rules for what is acceptable in advertising and marketing
5 communications, covering areas like honesty, decency, and social responsibility. 
6 https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/totalenergies-se-a24-1246357-totalenergies-se.html  

however a significant proportion of the  energy products TotalEnergies produced and  sold were fossil-fuel related products” (7) 

By the time that ruling had been made, the  advert had already been widely circulated  across a range of social media platforms and  the misleading information had been  disseminated. In reality, the ASA are  consistently outpaced, outmatched and  outwitted by the resources, scale and  sophistication of advertising campaigns  funded by oil and gas companies’ budgets.

Image credit: Badvertising

Image credit: Badvertising

Image credit: Badvertising

A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS

Aside from the devastating impacts that fossil fuels have on the climate, the direct  harms from burning fossil fuels are well documented with the British Medical Journal (8) estimating that in 2023 alone, this was the cause of over 5 million deaths globally. In 8 May 2025, over 30 health organisations (representing around 12 million health  professionals worldwide), pledged to no longer work with advertising agencies that  service fossil fuel clients. They stated conflicts of interest from the negative health  effects of disinformation campaigns of fossil fuel use. In 2024, The UK Faculty of  Public Health issued a statement which called for the “end of climate-harming  advertising and sponsorships that promote sectors such as fossil fuel companies” . (9) Doctors in Ireland recently called for a ban on advertising for fossil fuels (10) , and WHO Public Health Director Maria Neira has supported a ban on fossil fuel adverts for  years, describing them as “the new tobacco” . (11) 

A comparison to tobacco advertising is highly relevant. In 2003, when advertising for  tobacco was finally banned in the UK, it was estimated (12) there were a similar number 12 of deaths per year globally due to smoking as there are now from fossil fuels, around 4.8 million. Although the ban faced fierce resistance from powerful tobacco  companies and other vested interests, the continued harm caused by tobacco  advertising had become indefensible.

7 https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/totalenergies-se-a24-1246357-totalenergies-se.html
8 http://bit.ly/3GnqtWt 
9 http://bit.ly/44lgito 
10 http://bit.ly/4nmEmVq 
11 http://bit.ly/4lqxwww 
12 http://bit.ly/44wAzgZ 

FOSSIL FUEL ADVERTS UNDERMINE NET ZERO

UK net zero goals are significantly undermined by fossil fuel advertising. Recent research (13) commissioned by the Climate Change Committee, found that up to sixty percent of reductions in emissions need to come  

from consumer behaviour change. To reach net zero goals, large-scale electrification of several sectors including transport and heating will need consumer adoption. The UK government aims to significantly increase the uptake of domestic heat pumps to 600k installations per year (11-fold increase on current numbers). However, this is being severely undermined by messaging which asserts a renewable energy transition is in-hand and oil and gas are part of the consumer’s future. This is just one example of how advertising from oil and gas majors frustrates  

Image credit: AdFree Cities

Image credit: AdFree Cities

Image credit: AdFree Cities

SPORTS AND CULTURAL SPONSORSHIP

For big oil and gas, sport as well as culture sponsorship has the same appeal that it had for tobacco companies. For sports, it’s a clean, youthful, healthy image which offers the opportunity to ‘sport wash’ their polluting products. For culture, the sponsorship extends a kind of intellectual social licence to operate as oil and gas companies align themselves with the cultural foundations of our society.

Both sport and culture reach huge audiences moving past geographical boundaries through global media coverage. Both these sectors are already realising their audiences want change. For instance Rugby Football Union turned down ExxonMobil over worries of a fan backlash and The British Museum, The Tate, National Portrait Gallery and Royal Opera House have all ended partnerships with fossil fuel companies due to similar concerns. Losing sponsorship money is difficult, but losing an audience or fan base is worse. Banning sponsorship for fossil fuel companies is entirely possible - tobacco sponsorship in sport is now almost non-existent and sport and culture has continued to thrive. There is a growing cultural shift and momentum behind the recognition that fossil fuel companies, whose actions are driving environmental destruction, cannot continue to launder their reputations through sponsorship money.

13 https://bit.ly/40lIXgQ

BANS HAVE WIDE SUPPORT

Support for a ban on fossil fuel adverts comes from the public with a recent UK citizens jury (14) finding strong support for advertising bans, as well as restrictions and warnings. A European survey (15) in March 2025, of over 19,000 individuals (across 13 EU 15 Member States) found “widespread support for banning fossil fuel advertisements in  public spaces.”  

An important new finding is that very senior advertising industry insiders also  support an advertising ban for oil and gas products. Research from CAST (16) explored the views of senior UK advertising professionals on this issue (see briefing 35) (17) and found that many professionals had petitioned their agencies to cut ties with fossil  fuel clients. Being largely unsuccessful in this, they now support a government ban  on fossil fuel advertising. 

In 2024, at the highest level of the United Nations, the Secretary-General António  Guterres called for a ban on fossil fuel advertising, asking that all advertising  agencies drop their oil and gas clients and “stop acting as enablers to planetary  destruction.” (18)

BANS ALREADY WORK

The UK would not be the first government to ban adverts for fossil fuels. In 2022,  France implemented (19) a ban on adverts for oil and gas products after a citizen’s jury vote and countries such as Canada and Ireland are now considering the same. Cities  including Edinburgh, Sheffield, Amsterdam, The Hague and Stockholm have already implemented a ban (20) as well as Cheshire, Chester and Medway councils. There are currently around 46 municipalities and regions worldwide that have issued bans through a mix of ordinance and private law (21) and research shows (22) that bans of this kind conform with European law. Crucially, it’s important to note that revenue loss is  minimised, as advertising for other products and services replaces those from fossil  fuels . (23) 

14 http://bit.ly/3I3ZPT0 
15 https://capableclimate.eu/fossil-fuel-ad-ban-support/ 
16 Climate Action and Social Transformations, a cross-institutional research centre led by Prof. Lorraine Whitmarsh 17 https://cast.ac.uk/cast-briefings/ 
18 http://bit.ly/4l1EMiq 
19 http://bit.ly/3TbmxuM 
20 http://bit.ly/40tDSmB 
21 https://www.worldwithoutfossilads.org/frequently-asked-questions-2/ 
22 http://bit.ly/3I5vVhh 
23 http://bit.ly/4eAKLsf

MINIMAL COMMERCIAL CONSEQUENCES

The advertising and media sector are not heavily reliant on fossil fuel revenues -  research from Clean Creatives (24) estimate that percentage annual global revenue from oil and gas clients for advertising and PR firms sits at around 0.7% on average. Whilst oil and gas revenues are important in this sector, the loss of them would be  unlikely to be commercially detrimental. Many agencies thrive without oil and gas  clients. As of June 2025, over 1400 independent agencies worldwide signed the Clean Creatives Pledge (25) which promises not to work for fossil fuel companies. However, in the UK, agencies in the six largest holding groups continue to work with fossil fuel clients.(26)

ACTION IS NECESSARY

To protect UK citizens and support the Government's objectives on climate, MPs  must now support measures to end fossil fuel advertising in the UK. This is a low cost, high-impact step to reduce mortality, build public trust in the net zero  transition, and stop highly profitable polluters misleading the public. If you are an  MP, please speak in this debate and back the measures to ban fossil fuel advertising.  

AUTHOR Dr Victoria Harvey  
With fifteen years of experience working in the UK advertising production sector, Victoria’s academic research examines institutional mechanisms towards low carbon transformations  in the advertising industry. She is a CAST affiliate and works at Small World Consulting, an  organisation led by Professor Mike Berners-Lee, where her work focuses on carbon mapping  and sustainability strategies. 

24 http://bit.ly/4nkYvv9 (see page 18)  
25 https://cleancreatives.org/home 
26 The six largest advertising and PR holding groups are WPP, Omnicom, Havas, Publicis, Interpublic Group, Dentsu.